NASDAQ · STOCK
Advanced Energy
$289.73
52W $128.40 – $397.44
52/100
$11.01B
57.2
1.25
Is AEIS Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates Advanced Energy (AEIS) Watch with a composite score of 52/100
, based on 7 analysts with 43% agreement.
Last updated July 31, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +8.29 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -11.71 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — eps growing 145.3% yoy. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 22.6% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- EPS growing 145.3% YoY — Growth
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Weekly trend (sideways) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
- Beta of 1.35 means this name should amplify a favorable market regime — Macro
- News sentiment is positive (+0.21 across 14 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
- P/E of 54.1 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 5.8x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 22.6% signals elevated volatility — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
52/100
Agreement
43%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 72%
of 172 Technology peers
Value Analyst
bearish
40
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Multiples don't clear a genuine value bar here, or cheapness looks justified by weak fundamentals
− P/E of 54.1 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst
bullish
66
/ 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ EPS growing 145.3% YoY
− Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level
Technical Analyst
neutral
54
/ 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
+ Weekly trend (sideways) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement
− MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum
Risk Analyst
bearish
35
/ 100 · Low confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− Bollinger bandwidth of 22.6% signals elevated volatility
Macro Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
bullish
64
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.21 across 14 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 51.8 to 51.7.
- New bearish signals: 4 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 1 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 3 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 6 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Macro Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +2 bullish signal(s).
- News Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Risk Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
- Technical Analyst: score 46->54 (+8).
- Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
49.0
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-1.279
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Sideways
Weekly: Sideways
Market Structure
Lh Ll
Support
$288.83
Resistance
$389.58
Bollinger %B
0.43
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$285.91
Above
EMA 21
$298.66
Below
EMA 50
$314.70
Below
EMA 200
$285.03
Above
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
34
Growth
78
Profitability
0
Financial Health
83
Cash Flow
36
Valuation
P/E Ratio
57.2×
P/B Ratio
7.88×
PEG Ratio
0.36
Dividend Yield
0.00%
52W High
$397.44
52W Low
$128.40
Quality & Growth
ROE
10.9%
ROA
5.8%
Gross Margin
38.7%
Operating Margin
11.3%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
0.49
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 57.2 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 7.9x; PEG ratio of 0.4 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.1%; Return on assets of 0.1%; Net margin of 0.1%; Gross margin of 0.4%; Current ratio of 1.59 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.49; Free cash flow margin of 0.3% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (1.81); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 3.5%; 4 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth decelerating (+11.5% -> +7.7% QoQ); Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full AEIS Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →