Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
NASDAQ · STOCK

Corpay

CPAY Technology Unknown Updated July 31, 2026
$382.15
52W $252.84 – $395.49
51/100
$24.98B
22.6
0.88
AI Committee Verdict
Watch
Conviction: Moderate · 71% agreement · 7 analysts
+0.7%
-12.2%
0.05:1
Moderate

Is CPAY Bullish or Bearish?

Mixed. Innellis AI committee rates Corpay (CPAY) Watch with a composite score of 51/100 , based on 7 analysts with 71% agreement. Last updated July 31, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Buy
Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +9.46 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Reduce
Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -10.54 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Technical Analyst sees a compelling case — price structure making higher highs and higher lows. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 2.58) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • ROE of 30.6% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
  • Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
  • MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
  • Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
  • Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
Bear Case
  • Price-to-book of 5.4x prices in significant intangible value — Value
  • Debt-to-equity of 2.58 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
  • Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
  • RSI at 73 is in overbought territory — Technical
  • High leverage (debt-to-equity 2.58) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
  • Current ratio of 0.98 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
51/100
Agreement
71%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Moderate
Sector Rank
Top 86%
of 172 Technology peers
Value Analyst neutral
50 / 100 · High confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ ROE of 30.6% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation
− Price-to-book of 5.4x prices in significant intangible value
Growth Analyst neutral
50 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Moderate growth -- present but not remarkable
− Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level
Technical Analyst bullish
61 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− RSI at 73 is in overbought territory
Risk Analyst bearish
32 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 2.58) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst neutral
58 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst neutral
58 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
Portfolio Manager neutral
45 / 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 51.6 to 50.5.

Analyst-level changes:
  • Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +1 bullish signal(s).
  • Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
  • Technical Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
60.2
Neutral
MACD Histogram
2.128
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$335.55
Resistance
$384.65
Bollinger %B
0.79
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$378.92 Above
EMA 21
$368.83 Above
EMA 50
$355.84 Above
EMA 200
$331.85 Above

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
54
Growth
40
Profitability
1
Financial Health
7
Cash Flow
37
Valuation
P/E Ratio 22.6×
P/B Ratio 7.35×
PEG Ratio 1.38
Dividend Yield 0.00%
52W High $395.49
52W Low $252.84
Quality & Growth
ROE 27.6%
ROA 4.0%
Gross Margin 72.8%
Operating Margin 43.0%
Revenue Growth YoY
Debt / Equity 2.95
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 22.6 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 7.4x; PEG ratio of 1.4 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.3%; Return on assets of 0.0%; Net margin of 0.2%; Gross margin of 0.7%; Current ratio of 0.98 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 2.95; Free cash flow margin of 0.9% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (19.40); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 3.9%; EPS growth decelerating (+6.0% -> -4.0% QoQ); Analyst estimates falling over recent quarters
Get the Full CPAY Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →

Explore CPAY Further

📈 Rating History 💰 Earnings 📰 Recent Events 🔄 What Changed 📖 Thesis Evolution 🔍 Similar Stocks
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime