NASDAQ · STOCK
CoreWeave
$71.65
52W $60.55 – $153.20
48/100
$39.16B
-23.1
7.13
Is CRWV Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates CoreWeave (CRWV) Watch with a composite score of 48/100
, based on 7 analysts with 57% agreement.
Last updated July 31, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +12.46 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -7.54 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. News Analyst sees a compelling case — news sentiment is positive (+0.20 across 158 articles, 14d). Value Analyst remains cautious — price-to-book of 10.7x prices in significant intangible value. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Weekly trend (downtrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
- Beta of 3.01 means this name should amplify a favorable market regime — Macro
- News sentiment is positive (+0.20 across 158 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 10.7x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- ROE of only -40.3% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 6.48 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- 2 consecutive earnings misses -- execution concerns — Growth
- Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
48/100
Agreement
57%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 95%
of 172 Technology peers
Value Analyst
bearish
32
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Multiples don't clear a genuine value bar here, or cheapness looks justified by weak fundamentals
− Price-to-book of 10.7x prices in significant intangible value
Growth Analyst
neutral
52
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Moderate growth -- present but not remarkable
+ Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive
− 2 consecutive earnings misses -- execution concerns
Technical Analyst
neutral
49
/ 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
+ Weekly trend (downtrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement
− Price structure making lower highs and lower lows
Risk Analyst
bearish
33
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 6.48) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
bullish
64
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.20 across 158 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 46.9 to 47.5.
- New bearish signals: 3 appeared.
- New bullish signals: 3 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 5 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Macro Analyst, News Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +2 bullish signal(s).
- News Analyst: stance neutral->bullish; score 60->64 (+4); +1 bullish signal(s).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Risk Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
- Technical Analyst: score 41->49 (+8).
Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
44.9
Neutral
MACD Histogram
0.024
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Downtrend
Weekly: Downtrend
Market Structure
Lh Ll
Support
$67.17
Resistance
$114.23
Bollinger %B
0.31
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$72.40
Below
EMA 21
$78.66
Below
EMA 50
$88.56
Below
EMA 200
$99.29
Below
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
67
Growth
55
Profitability
0
Financial Health
0
Cash Flow
8
Valuation
P/E Ratio
-23.1×
P/B Ratio
7.95×
PEG Ratio
0.61
Dividend Yield
0.00%
52W High
$153.20
52W Low
$60.55
Quality & Growth
ROE
-35.0%
ROA
-2.4%
Gross Margin
69.4%
Operating Margin
-2.6%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
7.39
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of -23.1 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 7.9x; PEG ratio of 0.6 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of -0.3%; Return on assets of -0.0%; Net margin of -0.3%; Gross margin of 0.7%; Current ratio of 0.31 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 7.39; Free cash flow margin of -1.8% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is negative (-20.14); Most recent quarter missed estimates by 22.3%; 2 consecutive earnings misses; EPS growth accelerating (-600.0% -> -100.0% QoQ); Analyst estimates falling over recent quarters
Get the Full CRWV Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →