NASDAQ · STOCK
DoorDash
$196.26
52W $143.30 – $285.50
57/100
$85.47B
91.2
1.78
Is DASH Bullish or Bearish?
Bullish.
Innellis AI committee rates DoorDash (DASH) Buy with a composite score of 57/100
, based on 7 analysts with 57% agreement.
Last updated July 31, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Strong Buy
- Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +17.94 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Watch
- Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -2.06 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 31.0% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Value Analyst remains cautious — p/e of 92.9 is expensive by classic value standards. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- Revenue growing 31.0% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- EPS growing 189.2% YoY — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Weekly trend (sideways) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
- Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.27) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock — Risk
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
Bear Case
- P/E of 92.9 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 9.7x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 15.4% signals elevated volatility — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
57/100
Agreement
57%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 25%
of 31 Communication Services peers
Value Analyst
bearish
40
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Multiples don't clear a genuine value bar here, or cheapness looks justified by weak fundamentals
− P/E of 92.9 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst
bullish
85
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ Revenue growing 31.0% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum
Technical Analyst
bullish
61
/ 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum
Risk Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Moderate risk -- no single red flag, but nothing that clearly de-risks the position either
+ Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.27) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock
− Bollinger bandwidth of 15.4% signals elevated volatility
Macro Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
neutral
53
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score weakened from 60.9 to 57.1.
- Committee agreement increased notably from 43% to 57%.
- New bearish signals: 4 appeared.
- New bullish signals: 3 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 4 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Macro Analyst, Risk Analyst, Technical Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +2 bullish signal(s).
- News Analyst: score 58->53 (-4).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Risk Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 80->58 (-22); +1 bearish signal(s).
- Technical Analyst: stance neutral->bullish; score 54->61 (+8); +1 bullish signal(s).
- Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
62.9
Neutral
MACD Histogram
0.564
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Sideways
Weekly: Sideways
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$182.07
Resistance
$214.82
Bollinger %B
0.78
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$189.98
Above
EMA 21
$186.12
Above
EMA 50
$179.47
Above
EMA 200
$186.42
Above
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
33
Growth
53
Profitability
0
Financial Health
76
Cash Flow
37
Valuation
P/E Ratio
91.2×
P/B Ratio
8.38×
PEG Ratio
0.55
Dividend Yield
0.00%
52W High
$285.50
52W Low
$143.30
Quality & Growth
ROE
9.3%
ROA
4.8%
Gross Margin
50.9%
Operating Margin
4.9%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
0.32
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 91.2 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 8.4x; PEG ratio of 0.6 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.1%; Return on assets of 0.0%; Net margin of 0.1%; Gross margin of 0.5%; Current ratio of 1.43 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.32; Free cash flow margin of 0.7% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (4.02); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 13.0%; EPS growth roughly steady (-12.7% -> -12.5% QoQ); Analyst estimates falling over recent quarters
Get the Full DASH Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →