NASDAQ · STOCK
Kyndryl
$13.55
52W $10.10 – $37.05
49/100
$2.99B
15.8
1.74
Is KD Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates Kyndryl (KD) Watch with a composite score of 49/100
, based on 7 analysts with 57% agreement.
Last updated July 31, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +11.19 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -8.81 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Value Analyst sees a compelling case — p/e of 15.0 is inexpensive for the broad market. Growth Analyst remains cautious — eps declining -18.2% yoy despite any revenue growth. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- P/E of 15.0 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 16.5% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
- Beta of 1.74 means this name should amplify a favorable market regime — Macro
Bear Case
- Debt-to-equity of 3.48 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- EPS declining -18.2% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- 2 consecutive earnings misses -- execution concerns — Growth
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 3.48) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
- Current ratio of 0.88 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
49/100
Agreement
57%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 91%
of 172 Technology peers
Value Analyst
bullish
61
/ 100 · High confidence
Classic value case: cheap on multiples with earnings power to back it up
+ P/E of 15.0 is inexpensive for the broad market
− Debt-to-equity of 3.48 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case
Growth Analyst
bearish
29
/ 100 · High confidence
Growth story is weak, decelerating, or inconsistent
− EPS declining -18.2% YoY despite any revenue growth
Technical Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
+ MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum
Risk Analyst
bearish
33
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 3.48) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 47.3 to 48.8.
- New bearish signals: 3 appeared.
- New bullish signals: 3 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 5 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Macro Analyst, Value Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +2 bullish signal(s).
- News Analyst: score 54->58 (+3).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Risk Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
- Technical Analyst: score 48->58 (+10).
- Value Analyst: stance neutral->bullish; score 56->61 (+5); +1 bullish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
68.2
Neutral
MACD Histogram
0.194
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Sideways
Weekly: Downtrend
Market Structure
Lh Ll
Support
$13.27
Resistance
$13.65
Bollinger %B
0.92
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$12.99
Above
EMA 21
$12.48
Above
EMA 50
$12.35
Above
EMA 200
$17.46
Below
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
93
Growth
24
Profitability
0
Financial Health
3
Cash Flow
36
Valuation
P/E Ratio
15.8×
P/B Ratio
2.59×
PEG Ratio
-0.78
Dividend Yield
0.00%
52W High
$37.05
52W Low
$10.10
Quality & Growth
ROE
16.9%
ROA
1.6%
Gross Margin
21.8%
Operating Margin
4.2%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
4.22
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 15.8 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 2.6x; PEG ratio of -0.8 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.2%; Return on assets of 0.0%; Net margin of 0.0%; Gross margin of 0.2%; Current ratio of 0.88 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 4.22; Free cash flow margin of 0.4% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (1.51); Most recent quarter missed estimates by 61.2%; 2 consecutive earnings misses; EPS growth decelerating (+36.8% -> -65.4% QoQ); Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full KD Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →