NASDAQ · STOCK
NRG Energy
$134.31
52W $120.11 – $189.96
48/100
$28.33B
156.2
1.20
Is NRG Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates NRG Energy (NRG) Watch with a composite score of 48/100
, based on 7 analysts with 57% agreement.
Last updated July 31, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +12.46 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -7.54 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. News Analyst sees a compelling case — news sentiment is positive (+0.20 across 27 articles, 14d). Value Analyst remains cautious — p/e of 117.2 is expensive by classic value standards. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Weekly trend (downtrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
- News sentiment is positive (+0.20 across 27 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
- P/E of 117.2 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 18.2x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 9.78 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- EPS declining -81.7% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
48/100
Agreement
57%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 91%
of 45 Utilities peers
Value Analyst
bearish
28
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Multiples don't clear a genuine value bar here, or cheapness looks justified by weak fundamentals
− P/E of 117.2 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst
neutral
57
/ 100 · High confidence
Moderate growth -- present but not remarkable
+ Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive
− EPS declining -81.7% YoY despite any revenue growth
Technical Analyst
neutral
49
/ 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
+ Weekly trend (downtrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement
− Price structure making lower highs and lower lows
Risk Analyst
bearish
32
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 9.78) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
bullish
64
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.20 across 27 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 47.5 to 47.5.
- Committee agreement increased notably from 43% to 57%.
- New bearish signals: 4 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 1 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 2 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 6 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Macro Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +1 bullish signal(s).
- News Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Risk Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
- Technical Analyst: score 41->49 (+8).
- Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
49.8
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.527
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Downtrend
Weekly: Downtrend
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$120.16
Resistance
$150.67
Bollinger %B
0.42
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$133.57
Above
EMA 21
$135.21
Below
EMA 50
$137.64
Below
EMA 200
$147.51
Below
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
45
Growth
60
Profitability
1
Financial Health
2
Cash Flow
8
Valuation
P/E Ratio
156.2×
P/B Ratio
5.70×
PEG Ratio
-1.80
Dividend Yield
0.01%
52W High
$189.96
52W Low
$120.11
Quality & Growth
ROE
51.4%
ROA
3.0%
Gross Margin
17.1%
Operating Margin
3.0%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
4.79
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 156.2 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 5.7x; PEG ratio of -1.8 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.5%; Return on assets of 0.0%; Net margin of 0.0%; Gross margin of 0.2%; Current ratio of 0.84 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 4.79; Free cash flow margin of -0.4% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is negative (-1.73); Most recent quarter missed estimates by 17.6%; EPS growth accelerating (-62.5% -> +43.7% QoQ); Analyst estimates falling over recent quarters
Get the Full NRG Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →