NASDAQ · STOCK
Science Applications Intl Corp
$117.12
52W $81.08 – $123.41
55/100
$4.95B
13.1
0.28
⚠
Buy rating, but near-term risk/reward is unfavorable
The long-term recommendation is based on the composite investment score. The near-term risk/reward is based on nearby support and resistance levels. These can differ when a strong company trades close to resistance with support further below.
Is SAIC Bullish or Bearish?
Bullish.
Innellis AI committee rates Science Applications Intl Corp (SAIC) Buy with a composite score of 55/100
, based on 7 analysts with 57% agreement.
Last updated July 31, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Strong Buy
- Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +19.85 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Watch
- Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -0.15 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Technical Analyst sees a compelling case — price structure making higher highs and higher lows. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 1.66) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- P/E of 12.2 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 27.2% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Debt-to-equity of 1.66 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- Revenue declining -2.9% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now — Growth
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 1.66) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
55/100
Agreement
57%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 39%
of 172 Technology peers
Value Analyst
bullish
61
/ 100 · High confidence
Classic value case: cheap on multiples with earnings power to back it up
+ P/E of 12.2 is inexpensive for the broad market
− Debt-to-equity of 1.66 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case
Growth Analyst
bullish
60
/ 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution
− Revenue declining -2.9% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now
Technical Analyst
bullish
68
/ 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
Risk Analyst
bearish
30
/ 100 · Low confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 1.66) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
bullish
64
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.20 across 5 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 56.8 to 55.1.
- Conviction changed from moderate to contested.
- Committee agreement fell notably from 71% to 57%.
- New bearish signals: 2 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 1 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 2 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 2 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Macro Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +1 bullish signal(s).
- News Analyst: score 68->64 (-4); +1 bullish signal(s).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
53.8
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.073
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Sideways
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$112.14
Resistance
$117.73
Bollinger %B
0.68
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$116.86
Above
EMA 21
$115.00
Above
EMA 50
$110.73
Above
EMA 200
$104.38
Above
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
89
Growth
94
Profitability
1
Financial Health
30
Cash Flow
37
Valuation
P/E Ratio
13.1×
P/B Ratio
3.60×
PEG Ratio
0.54
Dividend Yield
0.01%
52W High
$123.41
52W Low
$81.08
Quality & Growth
ROE
23.9%
ROA
6.7%
Gross Margin
12.5%
Operating Margin
7.8%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
1.88
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 13.1 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 3.6x; PEG ratio of 0.5 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.2%; Return on assets of 0.1%; Net margin of 0.1%; Gross margin of 0.1%; Current ratio of 1.16 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 1.88; Free cash flow margin of 0.9% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (13.80); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 39.0%; 4 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth accelerating (+1.6% -> +23.3% QoQ); Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full SAIC Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →