Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
NASDAQ · STOCK

Silicon Labs

SLAB Technology Unknown Updated July 31, 2026
$217.49
52W $115.51 – $220.90
61/100
-141.6
1.36
AI Committee Verdict
Buy
Conviction: Contested · 57% agreement · 7 analysts
+1.8%
-7.3%
0.25:1
Contested
Buy rating, but near-term risk/reward is unfavorable
The long-term recommendation is based on the composite investment score. The near-term risk/reward is based on nearby support and resistance levels. These can differ when a strong company trades close to resistance with support further below.

Is SLAB Bullish or Bearish?

Bullish. Innellis AI committee rates Silicon Labs (SLAB) Buy with a composite score of 61/100 , based on 7 analysts with 57% agreement. Last updated July 31, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Strong Buy
Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +14.41 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Watch
Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -5.59 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is split. Analysts see this stock differently enough that the current rating reflects genuine uncertainty, not a weak signal.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • Revenue growing 25.1% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
  • 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
  • Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock — Risk
  • Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
  • Beta of 1.36 means this name should amplify a favorable market regime — Macro
  • News sentiment is positive (+1.00 across 1 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
  • Price-to-book of 4.2x prices in significant intangible value — Value
  • ROE of only -4.7% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
  • Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
  • MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
61/100
Agreement
57%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 4%
of 172 Technology peers
Value Analyst neutral
43 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
− Price-to-book of 4.2x prices in significant intangible value
Growth Analyst bullish
67 / 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ Revenue growing 25.1% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum
− Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level
Technical Analyst neutral
48 / 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
− MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum
Risk Analyst bullish
73 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Risk profile is manageable -- leverage, volatility, and event exposure all look contained
+ Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock
Macro Analyst neutral
58 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst bullish
90 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+1.00 across 1 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager neutral
45 / 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 61.7 to 60.6.

Analyst-level changes:
  • Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +2 bullish signal(s).
  • Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
41.6
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.126
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Sideways
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$201.13
Resistance
$220.89
Bollinger %B
0.23
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$217.15 Above
EMA 21
$217.56 Below
EMA 50
$216.71 Above
EMA 200
$190.61 Above

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
74
Growth
63
Profitability
0
Financial Health
100
Cash Flow
36
Valuation
P/E Ratio -141.6×
P/B Ratio 6.51×
PEG Ratio -0.96
Dividend Yield 0.00%
52W High $220.90
52W Low $115.51
Quality & Growth
ROE -5.9%
ROA -5.1%
Gross Margin 58.5%
Operating Margin -5.4%
Revenue Growth YoY
Debt / Equity 0.00
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of -141.6 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 6.5x; PEG ratio of -1.0 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of -0.1%; Return on assets of -0.1%; Net margin of -0.1%; Gross margin of 0.6%; Current ratio of 5.11 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.00; Free cash flow margin of 0.3% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (0.53); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 2.9%; 4 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth decelerating (+75.0% -> -5.4% QoQ); Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full SLAB Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →

Explore SLAB Further

📈 Rating History 💰 Earnings 📰 Recent Events 🔄 What Changed 📖 Thesis Evolution 🔍 Similar Stocks
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime