NASDAQ · STOCK
Boeing
$216.20
52W $176.77 – $254.35
50/100
$170.83B
81.0
1.21
Is BA Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates Boeing (BA) Watch with a composite score of 50/100
, based on 7 analysts with 43% agreement.
Last updated July 31, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +10.32 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -9.68 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. News Analyst sees a compelling case — news sentiment is positive (+0.20 across 243 articles, 14d). Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 9.92) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- ROE of 132.9% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Weekly trend (sideways) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
- News sentiment is positive (+0.20 across 243 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
- P/E of 70.5 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 31.2x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 9.92 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 9.92) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
50/100
Agreement
43%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 86%
of 158 Industrials peers
Value Analyst
bearish
40
/ 100 · High confidence
Multiples don't clear a genuine value bar here, or cheapness looks justified by weak fundamentals
+ ROE of 132.9% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation
− P/E of 70.5 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst
neutral
50
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Moderate growth -- present but not remarkable
− Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level
Technical Analyst
bullish
61
/ 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum
Risk Analyst
bearish
30
/ 100 · Low confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 9.92) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
bullish
64
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.20 across 243 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 51.1 to 49.7.
- New bearish signals: 3 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 1 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 2 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 3 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Macro Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +1 bullish signal(s).
- News Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
51.3
Neutral
MACD Histogram
0.702
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Sideways
Weekly: Sideways
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$207.96
Resistance
$218.52
Bollinger %B
0.47
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$215.37
Above
EMA 21
$216.14
Above
EMA 50
$218.38
Below
EMA 200
$217.48
Below
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
33
Growth
42
Profitability
1
Financial Health
14
Cash Flow
35
Valuation
P/E Ratio
81.0×
P/B Ratio
28.03×
PEG Ratio
0.43
Dividend Yield
0.00%
52W High
$254.35
52W Low
$176.77
Quality & Growth
ROE
41.0%
ROA
1.3%
Gross Margin
4.7%
Operating Margin
-5.4%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
7.52
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 81.0 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 28.0x; PEG ratio of 0.4 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.4%; Return on assets of 0.0%; Net margin of 0.0%; Gross margin of 0.0%; Current ratio of 1.14 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 7.52; Free cash flow margin of 0.1% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (0.31); Most recent quarter missed estimates by 142.1%; EPS growth decelerating (+82.1% -> -280.0% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 38.7%; Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full BA Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →