NASDAQ · STOCK
Iron Mountain Incorporated
$122.35
52W $77.77 – $134.68
54/100
$36.39B
134.4
1.22
Is IRM Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) Watch with a composite score of 54/100
, based on 7 analysts with 43% agreement.
Last updated July 31, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +6.47 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -13.53 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Technical Analyst sees a compelling case — price structure making higher highs and higher lows. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 56.38) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- ROE of 85.2% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Dividend yield of 2.8% pays you to wait — Value
- EPS growing 122.2% YoY — Growth
- 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 135.3 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 96.5x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 56.38 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 56.38) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
- Current ratio of 0.74 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
54/100
Agreement
43%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 52%
of 61 Real Estate peers
Value Analyst
bearish
40
/ 100 · High confidence
Multiples don't clear a genuine value bar here, or cheapness looks justified by weak fundamentals
+ ROE of 85.2% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation
− P/E of 135.3 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst
bullish
66
/ 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ EPS growing 122.2% YoY
− Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level
Technical Analyst
bullish
69
/ 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
Risk Analyst
bearish
32
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 56.38) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
bullish
65
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.22 across 9 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 54.6 to 53.5.
- Committee agreement fell notably from 57% to 43%.
- New bearish signals: 3 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 1 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 2 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 3 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Macro Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +1 bullish signal(s).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s); +1 bullish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
44.6
Neutral
MACD Histogram
0.040
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Sideways
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$112.30
Resistance
$130.22
Bollinger %B
0.49
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$123.94
Below
EMA 21
$124.00
Below
EMA 50
$123.37
Below
EMA 200
$112.14
Above
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
65
Growth
49
Profitability
0
Financial Health
100
Cash Flow
8
Valuation
P/E Ratio
134.4×
P/B Ratio
-29.88×
PEG Ratio
1.10
Dividend Yield
0.03%
52W High
$134.68
52W Low
$77.77
Quality & Growth
ROE
-14.7%
ROA
0.7%
Gross Margin
55.0%
Operating Margin
18.0%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
-16.23
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 134.4 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of -29.9x; PEG ratio of 1.1 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of -0.1%; Return on assets of 0.0%; Net margin of 0.0%; Gross margin of 0.6%; Current ratio of 3.72 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of -16.23; Free cash flow margin of -0.4% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is negative (-2.12); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 15.3%; 3 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth decelerating (+13.0% -> -1.6% QoQ); Analyst estimates falling over recent quarters
Get the Full IRM Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →