NASDAQ · STOCK
Omnicom Group
$78.73
52W $66.33 – $87.41
52/100
$21.59B
42.1
0.66
Is OMC Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates Omnicom Group (OMC) Watch with a composite score of 52/100
, based on 7 analysts with 43% agreement.
Last updated July 31, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +7.80 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -12.20 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. News Analyst sees a compelling case — news sentiment is positive (+0.33 across 26 articles, 14d). Value Analyst remains cautious — p/e of 360.4 is expensive by classic value standards. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- Dividend yield of 4.0% pays you to wait — Value
- Revenue growing 25.9% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
Bear Case
- P/E of 360.4 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- ROE of only 0.8% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- EPS declining -94.6% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Current ratio of 0.93 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
52/100
Agreement
43%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 54%
of 31 Communication Services peers
Value Analyst
bearish
35
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Multiples don't clear a genuine value bar here, or cheapness looks justified by weak fundamentals
+ Dividend yield of 4.0% pays you to wait
− P/E of 360.4 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst
bullish
63
/ 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ Revenue growing 25.9% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum
− EPS declining -94.6% YoY despite any revenue growth
Technical Analyst
bullish
61
/ 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum
Risk Analyst
bearish
35
/ 100 · Low confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− Current ratio of 0.93 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion
Macro Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
bullish
68
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.33 across 26 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 54.3 to 52.2.
- Committee agreement fell notably from 57% to 43%.
- New bearish signals: 3 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 3 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 3 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 2 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Macro Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +1 bullish signal(s).
- News Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Technical Analyst: score 69->61 (-8); +1 bearish signal(s).
- Value Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
43.1
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.319
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Downtrend
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$74.09
Resistance
$80.03
Bollinger %B
0.22
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$80.84
Below
EMA 21
$80.09
Below
EMA 50
$78.36
Above
EMA 200
$76.83
Above
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
66
Growth
77
Profitability
0
Financial Health
39
Cash Flow
37
Valuation
P/E Ratio
42.1×
P/B Ratio
1.62×
PEG Ratio
-0.57
Dividend Yield
0.04%
52W High
$87.41
52W Low
$66.33
Quality & Growth
ROE
-0.4%
ROA
-0.1%
Gross Margin
17.5%
Operating Margin
13.9%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
1.15
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 42.1 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 1.6x; PEG ratio of -0.6 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of -0.0%; Return on assets of -0.0%; Net margin of 0.0%; Gross margin of 0.2%; Current ratio of 0.92 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 1.15; Free cash flow margin of 0.9% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (11.66); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 1.7%; 2 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth accelerating (-26.6% -> +39.5% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 29.3%; Analyst estimates flat over recent quarters
Get the Full OMC Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →