Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
NASDAQ · STOCK

Oshkosh

OSK Industrials Unknown Updated July 31, 2026
$142.54
52W $116.77 – $180.49
60/100
16.3
1.23
AI Committee Verdict
Watch
Conviction: Contested · 57% agreement · 7 analysts
+0.7%
-3.9%
0.18:1
Contested

Is OSK Bullish or Bearish?

Mixed. Innellis AI committee rates Oshkosh (OSK) Watch with a composite score of 60/100 , based on 7 analysts with 57% agreement. Last updated July 31, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Buy
Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +0.25 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Reduce
Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -19.75 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Risk Analyst sees a compelling case — low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.26) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. Growth Analyst remains cautious — revenue declining -0.9% yoy -- this is not a growth story right now. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • P/E of 15.0 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
  • Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
  • Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
  • Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
  • Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.26) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock — Risk
  • Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
Bear Case
  • Revenue declining -0.9% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now — Growth
  • EPS declining -4.1% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
  • MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
60/100
Agreement
57%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 9%
of 158 Industrials peers
Value Analyst bullish
68 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Classic value case: cheap on multiples with earnings power to back it up
+ P/E of 15.0 is inexpensive for the broad market
Growth Analyst bearish
40 / 100 · High confidence
Growth story is weak, decelerating, or inconsistent
+ Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive
− Revenue declining -0.9% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now
Technical Analyst bullish
61 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum
Risk Analyst bullish
80 / 100 · Low confidence
Risk profile is manageable -- leverage, volatility, and event exposure all look contained
+ Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.26) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock
Macro Analyst neutral
58 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst bullish
66 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.27 across 29 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager neutral
45 / 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 59.9 to 59.8.

Analyst-level changes:
  • Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +1 bullish signal(s).
  • Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
  • Value Analyst: score 62->68 (+7); +1 bullish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
37.9
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.545
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$137.25
Resistance
$143.87
Bollinger %B
0.31
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$147.59 Below
EMA 21
$146.35 Below
EMA 50
$143.89 Below
EMA 200
$140.13 Above

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
96
Growth
61
Profitability
0
Financial Health
88
Cash Flow
37
Valuation
P/E Ratio 16.3×
P/B Ratio 1.98×
PEG Ratio -1.34
Dividend Yield 0.02%
52W High $180.49
52W Low $116.77
Quality & Growth
ROE 14.3%
ROA 6.4%
Gross Margin 15.8%
Operating Margin 7.5%
Revenue Growth YoY
Debt / Equity 0.24
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 16.3 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 2.0x; PEG ratio of -1.3 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.1%; Return on assets of 0.1%; Net margin of 0.1%; Gross margin of 0.2%; Current ratio of 1.72 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.24; Free cash flow margin of 0.9% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (18.35); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 9.1%; EPS growth accelerating (-62.4% -> +237.6% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of -15.8%; Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full OSK Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →

Explore OSK Further

📈 Rating History 💰 Earnings 📰 Recent Events 🔄 What Changed 📖 Thesis Evolution 🔍 Similar Stocks
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime