NASDAQ · STOCK
Blue Owl Capital
$10.29
52W $7.95 – $20.58
50/100
$16.10B
83.9
1.20
Is OWL Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates Blue Owl Capital (OWL) Watch with a composite score of 50/100
, based on 7 analysts with 43% agreement.
Last updated July 31, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +10.18 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -9.82 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Value Analyst remains cautious — p/e of 182.2 is expensive by classic value standards. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- Dividend yield of 9.1% pays you to wait — Value
- 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
Bear Case
- P/E of 182.2 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 10.6x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- ROE of only 3.9% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 1.51 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- RSI at 71 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Price trading above the upper Bollinger Band -- stretched — Technical
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
50/100
Agreement
43%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 91%
of 141 Financial Services peers
Value Analyst
bearish
29
/ 100 · High confidence
Multiples don't clear a genuine value bar here, or cheapness looks justified by weak fundamentals
+ Dividend yield of 9.1% pays you to wait
− P/E of 182.2 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst
bullish
77
/ 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution
Technical Analyst
neutral
48
/ 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
+ MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum
− RSI at 71 is in overbought territory
Risk Analyst
bearish
32
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 1.51) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
bullish
60
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 48.9 to 49.8.
- New bearish signals: 5 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 2 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 4 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 4 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Growth Analyst, Macro Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Growth Analyst: stance neutral->bullish; score 50->77 (+27); +2 bullish signal(s).
- Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +1 bullish signal(s).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Technical Analyst: score 58->48 (-10); +2 bearish signal(s).
- Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s); +1 bullish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
73.5
Overbought
MACD Histogram
0.100
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Sideways
Weekly: Downtrend
Market Structure
Lh Ll
Support
$8.31
Resistance
$10.91
Bollinger %B
1.15
Above Upper Band
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$9.77
Above
EMA 21
$9.57
Above
EMA 50
$9.55
Above
EMA 200
$11.83
Below
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
56
Growth
68
Profitability
0
Financial Health
50
Cash Flow
37
Valuation
P/E Ratio
83.9×
P/B Ratio
3.55×
PEG Ratio
-10.90
Dividend Yield
0.09%
52W High
$20.58
52W Low
$7.95
Quality & Growth
ROE
3.6%
ROA
0.6%
Gross Margin
61.1%
Operating Margin
22.6%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
0.27
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 83.9 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 3.6x; PEG ratio of -10.9 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.0%; Return on assets of 0.0%; Net margin of 0.0%; Gross margin of 0.6%; Current ratio of 0.32 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.27; Free cash flow margin of 1.0% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (1.92); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 0.5%; 3 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth accelerating (-20.8% -> +15.8% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 4.8%; Analyst estimates falling over recent quarters
Get the Full OWL Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →