NASDAQ · STOCK
Rambus
$91.00
52W $67.15 – $174.10
59/100
—
40.4
1.84
Is RMBS Bullish or Bearish?
Bullish.
Innellis AI committee rates Rambus (RMBS) Buy with a composite score of 59/100
, based on 7 analysts with 71% agreement.
Last updated July 31, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Strong Buy
- Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +16.10 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Watch
- Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -3.90 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
Some positive signals exist — quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive — but they are not yet strong enough to justify a Buy. The committee is monitoring for confirmation.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- ROE of 17.4% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Weekly trend (sideways) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
- Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock — Risk
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
- Beta of 1.92 means this name should amplify a favorable market regime — Macro
Bear Case
- P/E of 41.9 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 7.2x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 33.2% signals elevated volatility — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
59/100
Agreement
71%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Moderate
Sector Rank
Top 12%
of 172 Technology peers
Value Analyst
neutral
49
/ 100 · High confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ ROE of 17.4% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation
− P/E of 41.9 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst
bullish
75
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive
Technical Analyst
neutral
54
/ 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
+ Weekly trend (sideways) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement
− MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum
Risk Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Moderate risk -- no single red flag, but nothing that clearly de-risks the position either
+ Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock
− Bollinger bandwidth of 33.2% signals elevated volatility
Macro Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
bullish
75
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.53 across 24 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 58.9 to 58.9.
- Conviction changed from contested to moderate.
- Committee agreement increased notably from 57% to 71%.
- New bearish signals: 4 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 1 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 3 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 6 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Macro Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +2 bullish signal(s).
- News Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Risk Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
- Technical Analyst: score 46->54 (+8).
- Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
34.3
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.897
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Sideways
Weekly: Sideways
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$88.63
Resistance
$109.06
Bollinger %B
0.12
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$94.56
Below
EMA 21
$103.65
Below
EMA 50
$114.50
Below
EMA 200
$107.80
Below
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
7
Growth
78
Profitability
1
Financial Health
100
Cash Flow
37
Valuation
P/E Ratio
40.4×
P/B Ratio
6.61×
PEG Ratio
9.55
Dividend Yield
0.00%
52W High
$174.10
52W Low
$67.15
Quality & Growth
ROE
16.9%
ROA
15.1%
Gross Margin
78.3%
Operating Margin
35.5%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
0.01
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 40.4 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 6.6x; PEG ratio of 9.5 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.2%; Return on assets of 0.2%; Net margin of 0.3%; Gross margin of 0.8%; Current ratio of 9.75 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.01; Free cash flow margin of 0.9% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (2.77); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 5.4%; EPS growth accelerating (-7.2% -> +22.0% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 28.3%; Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full RMBS Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →