NASDAQ · STOCK
Southern Company
$94.60
52W $83.80 – $100.84
50/100
$106.57B
22.7
0.33
Is SO Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates Southern Company (SO) Watch with a composite score of 50/100
, based on 7 analysts with 71% agreement.
Last updated July 31, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +10.30 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -9.70 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Technical Analyst sees a compelling case — price structure making higher highs and higher lows. Growth Analyst remains cautious — eps declining -6.3% yoy despite any revenue growth. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- Dividend yield of 3.2% pays you to wait — Value
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
Bear Case
- Debt-to-equity of 2.02 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- EPS declining -6.3% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 2.02) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
- Current ratio of 0.65 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
50/100
Agreement
71%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Moderate
Sector Rank
Top 64%
of 45 Utilities peers
Value Analyst
neutral
50
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ Dividend yield of 3.2% pays you to wait
− Debt-to-equity of 2.02 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case
Growth Analyst
bearish
32
/ 100 · High confidence
Growth story is weak, decelerating, or inconsistent
− EPS declining -6.3% YoY despite any revenue growth
Technical Analyst
bullish
61
/ 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum
Risk Analyst
neutral
45
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Moderate risk -- no single red flag, but nothing that clearly de-risks the position either
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 2.02) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score weakened from 54.2 to 49.7.
- New bearish signals: 4 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 2 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 1 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 2 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Growth Analyst, Macro Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Growth Analyst: stance neutral->bearish; score 48->32 (-17); +1 bearish signal(s).
- Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +1 bullish signal(s).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Technical Analyst: score 69->61 (-8); +1 bearish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
41.2
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.186
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$93.20
Resistance
$96.40
Bollinger %B
0.21
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$95.55
Below
EMA 21
$95.54
Below
EMA 50
$95.03
Below
EMA 200
$93.36
Above
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
51
Growth
57
Profitability
0
Financial Health
17
Cash Flow
36
Valuation
P/E Ratio
22.7×
P/B Ratio
2.54×
PEG Ratio
3.27
Dividend Yield
0.03%
52W High
$100.84
52W Low
$83.80
Quality & Growth
ROE
12.0%
ROA
2.8%
Gross Margin
43.4%
Operating Margin
24.2%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
1.82
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 22.7 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 2.5x; PEG ratio of 3.3 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.1%; Return on assets of 0.0%; Net margin of 0.2%; Gross margin of 0.4%; Current ratio of 0.79 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 1.82; Free cash flow margin of 0.3% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (2.26); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 9.6%; 2 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth decelerating (+140.0% -> -14.4% QoQ); Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full SO Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →