NASDAQ · STOCK
DT Midstream
$138.10
52W $100.48 – $152.88
49/100
$14.08B
29.7
0.74
Is DTM Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates DT Midstream (DTM) Watch with a composite score of 49/100
, based on 7 analysts with 71% agreement.
Last updated July 31, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +10.53 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -9.47 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. News Analyst sees a compelling case — news sentiment is positive (+0.17 across 12 articles, 14d). Risk Analyst remains cautious — current ratio of 0.73 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- Dividend yield of 2.5% pays you to wait — Value
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
- News sentiment is positive (+0.17 across 12 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
- P/E of 30.1 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Price trading below the lower Bollinger Band -- stretched to the downside — Technical
- Current ratio of 0.73 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
49/100
Agreement
71%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Moderate
Sector Rank
Top 92%
of 40 Energy peers
Value Analyst
neutral
48
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ Dividend yield of 2.5% pays you to wait
− P/E of 30.1 is moderate-to-rich
Growth Analyst
neutral
50
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Moderate growth -- present but not remarkable
− Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level
Technical Analyst
neutral
48
/ 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
− MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum
Risk Analyst
bearish
35
/ 100 · Low confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− Current ratio of 0.73 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion
Macro Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
bullish
63
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.17 across 12 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 52.4 to 49.5.
- Conviction changed from contested to moderate.
- Committee agreement increased sharply from 43% to 71%.
- New bearish signals: 4 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 1 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 2 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 4 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Growth Analyst, Macro Analyst, Technical Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Growth Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 75->50 (-25); +1 bearish signal(s).
- Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +1 bullish signal(s).
- News Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Technical Analyst: stance bearish->neutral; score 38->48 (+10).
- Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
36.4
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.991
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Sideways
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$137.84
Resistance
$143.09
Bollinger %B
0.13
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$140.13
Below
EMA 21
$142.36
Below
EMA 50
$142.87
Below
EMA 200
$132.14
Above
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
68
Growth
39
Profitability
1
Financial Health
50
Cash Flow
37
Valuation
P/E Ratio
29.7×
P/B Ratio
2.95×
PEG Ratio
1.27
Dividend Yield
0.02%
52W High
$152.88
52W Low
$100.48
Quality & Growth
ROE
9.3%
ROA
4.3%
Gross Margin
63.2%
Operating Margin
49.7%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
0.01
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 29.7 (moderate relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 2.9x; PEG ratio of 1.3 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.1%; Return on assets of 0.0%; Net margin of 0.4%; Gross margin of 0.6%; Current ratio of 0.00 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.01; Free cash flow margin of 0.7% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (6.79); Most recent quarter missed estimates by 7.5%; EPS growth decelerating (+17.6% -> -15.0% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 3.9%; Analyst estimates flat over recent quarters
Get the Full DTM Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →