NASDAQ · STOCK
Healthcare Realty Trust
$21.02
52W $15.30 – $22.04
53/100
$7.37B
-80.1
0.83
Is HR Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates Healthcare Realty Trust (HR) Watch with a composite score of 53/100
, based on 7 analysts with 57% agreement.
Last updated July 31, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +7.49 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -12.51 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Technical Analyst sees a compelling case — price structure making higher highs and higher lows. Risk Analyst remains cautious — current ratio of 0.52 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- Price-to-book of 1.3x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Dividend yield of 4.5% pays you to wait — Value
- 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bullish picture — Technical
Bear Case
- ROE of only -4.3% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- Revenue declining -25.9% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now — Growth
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- Current ratio of 0.52 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
53/100
Agreement
57%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 60%
of 61 Real Estate peers
Value Analyst
neutral
55
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ Price-to-book of 1.3x is a discount to asset value
− ROE of only -4.3% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason
Growth Analyst
neutral
43
/ 100 · High confidence
Moderate growth -- present but not remarkable
+ 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution
− Revenue declining -25.9% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now
Technical Analyst
bullish
68
/ 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
Risk Analyst
bearish
35
/ 100 · Low confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− Current ratio of 0.52 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion
Macro Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
bullish
63
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.18 across 11 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score weakened from 55.8 to 52.5.
- New bearish signals: 2 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 2 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 4 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 4 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Growth Analyst, Macro Analyst, Risk Analyst, Technical Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Growth Analyst: stance bearish->neutral; score 25->43 (+18); +1 bullish signal(s).
- Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +1 bullish signal(s).
- News Analyst: score 90->63 (-27); +1 bullish signal(s).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Risk Analyst: stance neutral->bearish; score 52->35 (-18).
- Technical Analyst: stance neutral->bullish; score 58->68 (+10).
- Value Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
41.4
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.016
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Sideways
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$18.41
Resistance
$22.34
Bollinger %B
0.44
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$21.38
Below
EMA 21
$21.13
Below
EMA 50
$20.57
Above
EMA 200
$18.90
Above
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
99
Growth
32
Profitability
0
Financial Health
50
Cash Flow
36
Valuation
P/E Ratio
-80.1×
P/B Ratio
1.71×
PEG Ratio
-0.49
Dividend Yield
0.05%
52W High
$22.04
52W Low
$15.30
Quality & Growth
ROE
-5.3%
ROA
-2.7%
Gross Margin
15.7%
Operating Margin
21.8%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
0.06
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of -80.1 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 1.7x; PEG ratio of -0.5 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of -0.1%; Return on assets of -0.0%; Net margin of -0.1%; Gross margin of 0.2%; Current ratio of 0.08 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.06; Free cash flow margin of 0.2% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (0.18); Most recent quarter missed estimates by 802.8%; EPS growth decelerating (+123.5% -> -100.0% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 71.1%; Analyst estimates falling over recent quarters
Get the Full HR Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →