Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
NASDAQ · STOCK

Royal Gold

RGLD Basic Materials Unknown Updated July 21, 2026
$193.91
52W $150.75 – $306.25
60/100
22.3
0.45
Explore RGLD Further
📈 Rating History 💰 Earnings 📰 Recent Events 🔄 What Changed 📖 Thesis Evolution 🔍 Similar Stocks
AI Committee Verdict
Watch
Conviction: Contested · 57% agreement · 7 analysts
+2.0%
-9.8%
0.21:1
Contested
Is RGLD Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed. Innellis AI committee rates Royal Gold (RGLD) Watch with a composite score of 60/100 , based on 7 analysts with 57% agreement. Last updated July 21, 2026.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Risk Analyst sees a compelling case — low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.13) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. Technical Analyst remains cautious — price structure making lower highs and lower lows. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
  • RSI at or below 30 signals oversold conditions — bullish entry bias.
  • Daily volatility (ATR%) above ~3% is treated as elevated risk.
Bear Case
  • MACD histogram is negative (-0.323) — bearish momentum.
  • Daily trend is down — entering long positions against the trend.
  • Both daily and weekly trends are bearish — strong multi-timeframe downtrend.
  • Lower Highs / Lower Lows structure confirms bearish price action.
  • Risk/reward is unfavorable: 9.8% downside vs 2.0% upside.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus As of July 21, 2026
Overall Committee Score
60/100
Agreement
57%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Value Analyst neutral
55 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
− P/E of 25.3 is moderate-to-rich
Growth Analyst bullish
69 / 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ Revenue growing 71.0% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum
− 2 consecutive earnings misses -- execution concerns
Technical Analyst bearish
32 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is deteriorating -- trend and/or momentum are working against this name
− Price structure making lower highs and lower lows
Risk Analyst bullish
80 / 100 · Low confidence
Risk profile is manageable -- leverage, volatility, and event exposure all look contained
+ Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.13) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock
Macro Analyst bullish
70 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst bullish
69 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.36 across 11 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager neutral
45 / 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2975.52)
Open Full Terminal →
Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 60.0 to 60.0.

Comparing 2026-07-20 to 2026-07-21 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
26.9
Oversold
MACD Histogram
-0.323
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Downtrend
Weekly: Sideways
Market Structure
Lh Ll
Support
$168.94
Resistance
$191.12
Bollinger %B
0.09
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$192.81 Above
EMA 21
$198.77 Below
EMA 50
$211.31 Below
EMA 200
$220.53 Below
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
87
Growth
59
Profitability
1
Financial Health
100
Cash Flow
8
Valuation
P/E Ratio 22.3×
P/B Ratio 2.14×
PEG Ratio 0.58
Dividend Yield 0.01%
52W High $306.25
52W Low $150.75
Quality & Growth
ROE 6.5%
ROA 4.9%
Gross Margin 68.5%
Operating Margin 64.2%
Revenue Growth YoY
Debt / Equity 0.08
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 22.3 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 2.1x; PEG ratio of 0.6 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.1%; Return on assets of 0.0%; Net margin of 0.5%; Gross margin of 0.7%; Current ratio of 3.52 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.08; Free cash flow margin of -0.3% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is negative (-2.89); Most recent quarter missed estimates by 9.1%; 2 consecutive earnings misses; EPS growth accelerating (-6.8% -> +41.7% QoQ); Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Key Risks
  • MACD histogram is negative (-0.323) — bearish momentum.
  • Daily trend is down — entering long positions against the trend.
  • Both daily and weekly trends are bearish — strong multi-timeframe downtrend.
  • Lower Highs / Lower Lows structure confirms bearish price action.
  • Risk/reward is unfavorable: 9.8% downside vs 2.0% upside.
This risk summary is generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative opinion. All investors should conduct their own due diligence. This is not financial advice.
Get the Full RGLD Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal → Mobile
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime