Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
NASDAQ · STOCK

Ford Motor Company

F Consumer Cyclical Unknown Updated August 01, 2026
$14.67
52W $10.68 – $17.78
52/100
$58.54B
-7.9
1.83
AI Committee Verdict
Watch
Conviction: Contested · 43% agreement · 7 analysts
+0.8%
-9.8%
0.08:1
Contested

Is F Bullish or Bearish?

Mixed. Innellis AI committee rates Ford Motor Company (F) Watch with a composite score of 52/100 , based on 7 analysts with 43% agreement. Last updated August 01, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Buy
Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +8.37 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Reduce
Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -11.63 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — market regime is bullish (bull market -- normal position sizing). Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 4.54) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • Price-to-book of 1.5x is a discount to asset value — Value
  • Dividend yield of 4.0% pays you to wait — Value
  • Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
  • MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
  • Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bullish picture — Technical
  • Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
  • ROE of only -18.9% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
  • Debt-to-equity of 4.54 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
  • Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
  • High leverage (debt-to-equity 4.54) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of August 01, 2026
Overall Committee Score
52/100
Agreement
43%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 79%
of 124 Consumer Cyclical peers
Value Analyst neutral
48 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ Price-to-book of 1.5x is a discount to asset value
− ROE of only -18.9% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason
Growth Analyst bearish
38 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Growth story is weak, decelerating, or inconsistent
− Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level
Technical Analyst bullish
69 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
Risk Analyst bearish
30 / 100 · Low confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 4.54) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst bullish
70 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst bullish
62 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
Portfolio Manager neutral
45 / 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2535.03)
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 50.1 to 51.6.

Analyst-level changes:
  • Macro Analyst: stance neutral->bullish; score 58->70 (+12); +1 bullish signal(s).
  • Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-07-31 to 2026-08-01 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
54.9
Neutral
MACD Histogram
0.096
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$13.23
Resistance
$14.79
Bollinger %B
0.73
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$14.65 Above
EMA 21
$14.41 Above
EMA 50
$14.15 Above
EMA 200
$13.23 Above

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
99
Growth
66
Profitability
0
Financial Health
12
Cash Flow
36
Valuation
P/E Ratio -7.9×
P/B Ratio 1.64×
PEG Ratio 0.02
Dividend Yield 0.04%
52W High $17.78
52W Low $10.68
Quality & Growth
ROE -22.8%
ROA -2.8%
Gross Margin 10.8%
Operating Margin 2.0%
Revenue Growth YoY
Debt / Equity 4.51
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of -7.9 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 1.6x; PEG ratio of 0.0 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of -0.2%; Return on assets of -0.0%; Net margin of -0.0%; Gross margin of 0.1%; Current ratio of 1.09 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 4.51; Free cash flow margin of 0.4% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (1.83); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 17.7%; 2 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth decelerating (+407.7% -> -36.4% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 13.5%; Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full F Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →

Explore F Further

📈 Rating History 💰 Earnings 📰 Recent Events 🔄 What Changed 📖 Thesis Evolution 🔍 Similar Stocks
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime