NASDAQ · STOCK
Hasbro
$93.93
52W $69.50 – $106.98
53/100
$13.29B
16.7
0.48
Is HAS Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates Hasbro (HAS) Watch with a composite score of 53/100
, based on 7 analysts with 57% agreement.
Last updated August 01, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +7.32 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -12.68 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — market regime is bullish (bull market -- normal position sizing). Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 6.06) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- ROE of 136.7% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Dividend yield of 3.0% pays you to wait — Value
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 21.6x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 6.06 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- RSI at 71 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Price structure (LH_LL) contradicts the uptrend -- mixed signals — Technical
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 6.06) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of August 01, 2026
Overall Committee Score
53/100
Agreement
57%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 69%
of 124 Consumer Cyclical peers
Value Analyst
neutral
50
/ 100 · High confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ ROE of 136.7% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation
− Price-to-book of 21.6x prices in significant intangible value
Growth Analyst
bullish
60
/ 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution
− Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level
Technical Analyst
neutral
54
/ 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− RSI at 71 is in overbought territory
Risk Analyst
bearish
32
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 6.06) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst
bullish
70
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow is mixed or quiet -- no strong signal either way right now
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2535.03)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 50.9 to 52.7.
- Conviction changed from moderate to contested.
- Committee agreement fell notably from 71% to 57%.
- New bearish signals: 4 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 4 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Macro Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: stance neutral->bullish; score 58->70 (+12).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Risk Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
- Technical Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-31 to 2026-08-01 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
70.8
Overbought
MACD Histogram
1.502
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Sideways
Market Structure
Lh Ll
Support
$90.63
Resistance
$94.19
Bollinger %B
0.83
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$91.31
Above
EMA 21
$87.60
Above
EMA 50
$86.68
Above
EMA 200
$85.72
Above
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
64
Growth
68
Profitability
0
Financial Health
36
Cash Flow
37
Valuation
P/E Ratio
16.7×
P/B Ratio
18.16×
PEG Ratio
0.02
Dividend Yield
0.03%
52W High
$106.98
52W Low
$69.50
Quality & Growth
ROE
-59.9%
ROA
-5.8%
Gross Margin
70.3%
Operating Margin
23.9%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
4.84
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 16.7 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 18.2x; PEG ratio of 0.0 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of -0.6%; Return on assets of -0.1%; Net margin of 0.2%; Gross margin of 0.7%; Current ratio of 1.66 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 4.84; Free cash flow margin of 0.9% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (8.59); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 11.3%; 5 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth decelerating (-2.6% -> -12.9% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of -1.5%; Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full HAS Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →