NASDAQ · STOCK
Linde plc
$478.46
52W $387.78 – $548.20
49/100
$221.30B
30.7
0.72
Is LIN Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates Linde plc (LIN) Watch with a composite score of 49/100
, based on 7 analysts with 43% agreement.
Last updated August 01, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +11.33 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -8.67 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — market regime is bullish (bull market -- normal position sizing). Risk Analyst remains cautious — current ratio of 0.88 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- ROE of 18.4% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
- News sentiment is positive (+0.20 across 33 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
- P/E of 31.2 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Price-to-book of 5.2x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- RSI at 20 is in oversold territory (could mean either capitulation or a bounce setup) — Technical
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Price trading below the lower Bollinger Band -- stretched to the downside — Technical
- Current ratio of 0.88 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of August 01, 2026
Overall Committee Score
49/100
Agreement
43%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 96%
of 54 Basic Materials peers
Value Analyst
neutral
48
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ ROE of 18.4% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation
− P/E of 31.2 is moderate-to-rich
Growth Analyst
bearish
40
/ 100 · Low confidence
Growth story is weak, decelerating, or inconsistent
Technical Analyst
bearish
38
/ 100 · High confidence
Price action is deteriorating -- trend and/or momentum are working against this name
− RSI at 20 is in oversold territory (could mean either capitulation or a bounce setup)
Risk Analyst
bearish
35
/ 100 · Low confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− Current ratio of 0.88 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion
Macro Analyst
bullish
70
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
bullish
64
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.20 across 33 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2535.03)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 51.2 to 48.7.
- Committee agreement fell notably from 57% to 43%.
- New bearish signals: 5 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 1 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 1 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 3 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Growth Analyst, Macro Analyst, Technical Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Growth Analyst: stance bullish->bearish; score 62->40 (-22).
- Macro Analyst: stance neutral->bullish; score 58->70 (+12).
- News Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Technical Analyst: stance neutral->bearish; score 48->38 (-10); +2 bearish signal(s).
- Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-31 to 2026-08-01 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
20.0
Oversold
MACD Histogram
-3.059
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Sideways
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$453.23
Resistance
$478.66
Bollinger %B
-0.18
Below Lower Band
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$504.44
Below
EMA 21
$511.16
Below
EMA 50
$511.86
Below
EMA 200
$488.54
Below
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
24
Growth
56
Profitability
1
Financial Health
49
Cash Flow
36
Valuation
P/E Ratio
30.7×
P/B Ratio
5.66×
PEG Ratio
3.01
Dividend Yield
0.01%
52W High
$548.20
52W Low
$387.78
Quality & Growth
ROE
18.0%
ROA
8.0%
Gross Margin
33.1%
Operating Margin
28.7%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
0.65
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 30.7 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 5.7x; PEG ratio of 3.0 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.2%; Return on assets of 0.1%; Net margin of 0.2%; Gross margin of 0.3%; Current ratio of 0.88 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.65; Free cash flow margin of 0.5% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (10.76); Most recent quarter missed estimates by 0.6%; EPS growth roughly steady (+3.1% -> +3.9% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 10.0%; Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full LIN Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →