NASDAQ · STOCK
Carvana
$62.36
52W $54.46 – $97.38
51/100
$68.40B
21.5
3.46
Is CVNA Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates Carvana (CVNA) Watch with a composite score of 51/100
, based on 7 analysts with 57% agreement.
Last updated July 31, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +8.93 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -11.07 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 51.7% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 19.5% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- ROE of 51.6% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Revenue growing 51.7% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- EPS growing 126.9% YoY — Growth
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
- Beta of 3.48 means this name should amplify a favorable market regime — Macro
- News sentiment is positive (+0.33 across 72 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
- P/E of 46.3 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 26.7x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 19.5% signals elevated volatility — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
51/100
Agreement
57%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 65%
of 124 Consumer Cyclical peers
Value Analyst
neutral
42
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ ROE of 51.6% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation
− P/E of 46.3 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst
bullish
68
/ 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ Revenue growing 51.7% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum
− Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level
Technical Analyst
neutral
42
/ 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
− Price structure making lower highs and lower lows
Risk Analyst
bearish
35
/ 100 · Low confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− Bollinger bandwidth of 19.5% signals elevated volatility
Macro Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
bullish
68
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.33 across 72 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 51.8 to 51.1.
- Committee agreement increased notably from 43% to 57%.
- New bearish signals: 3 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 1 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 3 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 3 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Macro Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +2 bullish signal(s).
- News Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Risk Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
42.4
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.256
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Downtrend
Weekly: Sideways
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$61.04
Resistance
$64.63
Bollinger %B
0.24
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$63.80
Below
EMA 21
$65.03
Below
EMA 50
$66.77
Below
EMA 200
$68.91
Below
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
58
Growth
61
Profitability
1
Financial Health
78
Cash Flow
37
Valuation
P/E Ratio
21.5×
P/B Ratio
11.11×
PEG Ratio
0.09
Dividend Yield
0.00%
52W High
$97.38
52W Low
$54.46
Quality & Growth
ROE
40.9%
ROA
10.7%
Gross Margin
19.4%
Operating Margin
8.9%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
1.40
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 21.5 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 11.1x; PEG ratio of 0.1 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.4%; Return on assets of 0.1%; Net margin of 0.1%; Gross margin of 0.2%; Current ratio of 3.93 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 1.40; Free cash flow margin of 0.8% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is positive (1.29); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 1.3%; 2 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth decelerating (+59.4% -> +24.3% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 64.1%; Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full CVNA Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →