NASDAQ · STOCK
Royal Caribbean Group
$318.18
52W $232.10 – $366.50
49/100
$85.37B
19.6
1.76
Is RCL Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates Royal Caribbean Group (RCL) Watch with a composite score of 49/100
, based on 7 analysts with 57% agreement.
Last updated July 31, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +11.43 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -8.57 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. News Analyst sees a compelling case — news sentiment is positive (+0.33 across 70 articles, 14d). Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 2.13) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- ROE of 43.8% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
- Beta of 1.79 means this name should amplify a favorable market regime — Macro
- News sentiment is positive (+0.33 across 70 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 7.6x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 2.13 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- RSI at 75 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Price trading above the upper Bollinger Band -- stretched — Technical
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 2.13) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of July 31, 2026
Overall Committee Score
49/100
Agreement
57%
Analysts
7
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 85%
of 124 Consumer Cyclical peers
Value Analyst
neutral
50
/ 100 · High confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ ROE of 43.8% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation
− Price-to-book of 7.6x prices in significant intangible value
Growth Analyst
bearish
38
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Growth story is weak, decelerating, or inconsistent
− Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level
Technical Analyst
neutral
48
/ 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
+ MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum
− RSI at 75 is in overbought territory
Risk Analyst
bearish
33
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 2.13) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst
neutral
58
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is mixed or neutral -- not a strong tailwind or headwind either way
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
bullish
68
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.33 across 70 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager
neutral
45
/ 100 · High confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− Sector concentration is already high (HHI 2744.14)
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score moved marginally from 49.3 to 48.6.
- Committee agreement increased notably from 43% to 57%.
- New bearish signals: 4 appeared.
- Bullish support removed: 1 signal(s) disappeared.
- New bullish signals: 3 appeared.
- Bearish pressure eased: 4 signal(s) disappeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Macro Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Macro Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 65->58 (-8); +2 bullish signal(s).
- News Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
- Portfolio Manager: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Risk Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
- Technical Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
Comparing 2026-07-30 to 2026-07-31 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
68.3
Neutral
MACD Histogram
3.679
Bullish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Downtrend
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$264.56
Resistance
$333.25
Bollinger %B
0.89
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$309.38
Above
EMA 21
$301.66
Above
EMA 50
$294.55
Above
EMA 200
$294.20
Above
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
61
Growth
57
Profitability
1
Financial Health
5
Cash Flow
8
Valuation
P/E Ratio
19.6×
P/B Ratio
8.36×
PEG Ratio
0.91
Dividend Yield
0.02%
52W High
$366.50
52W Low
$232.10
Quality & Growth
ROE
42.6%
ROA
10.3%
Gross Margin
46.6%
Operating Margin
27.3%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
2.30
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 19.6 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 8.4x; PEG ratio of 0.9 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 0.4%; Return on assets of 0.1%; Net margin of 0.2%; Gross margin of 0.5%; Current ratio of 0.21 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 2.30; Free cash flow margin of -0.1% (thin cash generation); Free cash flow per share is negative (-1.55); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 4.6%; 2 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth decelerating (+28.6% -> +16.9% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of -3.9%; Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full RCL Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →